Showing posts with label media news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media news. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part XIII

Hearst Threatens to End San Francisco Paper

Hearst Corporation said Tuesday that it would close or sell The San Francisco Chronicle unless it could wring concessions from its unions, raising the prospect of San Francisco becoming the largest city in the country to lose its dominant newspaper.

Hearst said The Chronicle, which has daily circulation of 339,000, lost more than $50 million in 2008 and will lose more this year. It has had significant losses every year since 2001.

“Without the specific changes we are seeking across the entire Chronicle organization, we will have no choice but to quickly seek a buyer for The Chronicle or, should a buyer not be found, to shut the newspaper down,” said a statement by Frank A. Bennack Jr., Hearst’s vice chairman and chief executive, and Steven R. Swartz, president of its newspaper division. The company did not specify those changes, other than “a significant reduction in the number of its unionized and nonunion employees.”

The California Media Guild, which represents many Chronicle employees, had no immediate response to the ultimatum, which union officials said surprised them.

A Hearst executive called the statement “a warning” to the unions, and said that the company did not want to close the paper. He was granted anonymity because he was not authorized to speak for the company.

Hearst owned The San Francisco Examiner for more than a century, but the rival Chronicle became the city’s dominant paper. In 2000, Hearst bought The Chronicle for $660 million, and sold The Examiner. But it kept many Examiner workers, significantly increasing the size and cost of The Chronicle’s staff.

Since 2006, newspaper advertising revenue has plunged nationwide, and more so in California. The Chronicle has made deep cuts, signed a contract to outsource printing and explored selling its building. The Examiner, which has a much smaller staff, is now a free paper.

---------

Wow. If the primary paper in a city of 750,000 isn't safe...


Saturday, November 22, 2008

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part XI

1. People aren't spending money on print advertising any more.



Source: SeekingAlpha.com (Butch found this)

2. One of the nice things about working the sports desk is that I don't often have to deal with bullshit like this:

USDA report details more involvement by Vick

I think this is the first time I've ever written a headline and needed to shower immediately afterwards.

Monday, June 30, 2008

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part X

I've highlighted the thing about irony in the middle.

----------

Newspapers, reeling from slumping ads, slash jobs

By SETH SUTEL, AP Business Writer

Sun Jun 29, 2:55 PM ET

Even for an industry awash in bad news, the newspaper business went through one of its most severe retrenchments in recent memory last week.

Half a dozen newspapers said they would slash payrolls, one said it would outsource all its printing, and Tribune Co., one of the biggest publishers in the country, said it might sell its iconic headquarters tower in Chicago and the building that houses the Los Angeles Times.

The increasingly rapid and broad decline in the newspaper business in recent months has surprised even the most pessimistic financial analysts, many of whom say it's too hard to tell how far the slump will go.

"They're in survival mode now," said Mike Simonton, a media analyst at Fitch Ratings, a credit analysis agency.

"We had very grim expectations for the sector," Simonton said, and publishers have either met or surpassed his estimates for how bad the results would be.

Last week alone, deep staff cuts were announced at The Hartford Courant and The (Baltimore) Sun — two Tribune papers — as well as at the Daytona Beach-Journal, while The Detroit News and Detroit Free Press said they hoped to reduce the head count in their joint operations by 7 percent through buyouts. The Boston Herald said up to 160 employees would be laid off as it outsourced its printing operations, and in a memo explaining the terms of its job security pledge, the Star-Ledger in Newark, N.J., said it is operating in the red. The week before, McClatchy Co. said companywide staff cuts of 10 percent were coming.

Tribune, meanwhile, told its employees Wednesday that it hoped to wring more value out of its "underutilized" real estate in Chicago and Los Angeles, extending an asset-selling program Tribune is pursuing to service a $13 billion debt load, much of which it took on from going private.

Tribune has already reached a deal to sell one of its largest newspapers, Long Island-based Newsday, but ran into delays early this month in liquidating Wrigley Field, where the Chicago Cubs play, when negotiations for the field's purchase by a state agency broke down over financing. Tribune is also moving to sell the Cubs.

Tribune has enough money to meet its debt requirements this year, bond analysts have said, but it must make headway on asset sales in order to meet its obligations in 2009.

Tribune's troubles reflect broader problems in the industry, where a deepening economic downturn is worsening losses from a long-term shift away from print advertising toward online, especially in classified categories like help wanted, autos and real estate, where rivals such as Craigslist, Move.com and AutoTrader.com are thriving.

Advertising is by far the most important source of revenue for newspapers. And in the first quarter, their overall ad revenue slumped 12.9 percent, led by a 24.9 percent drop-off in classifieds, compared with the same period a year earlier.

*****

In fact, the industry group that compiles and releases ad revenue figures, the Newspaper Association of America, this month stopped putting out quarterly press releases with the numbers, though it quietly updated them on its Web site.

*****

NAA spokeswoman Sheila Owens said in an e-mailed statement that the organization will now put out press releases only with full-year data "to keep the market focused on the longer-term industry transition from print to a multiplatform medium."

Some say complacency in the industry about the threat the Internet posed is to blame for the current quagmire.

Speaking on the CNBC business news cable channel Friday, Sam Zell, the real estate magnate who is now Tribune's CEO, said newspapers have historically been "monopolies" in their local markets and "insulated from reality," according to a transcript of his remarks provided by CNBC.

Going forward, if ad revenues continue to slide rapidly, companies including Journal Register Co., MediaNews Group Inc. and — in the absence of further asset sales — Tribune could then risk violating their loan terms, said Emile Courtney, a media industry credit analyst for Standard & Poor's.

Already, just two major publishers have investment-grade debt under S&P's ratings — Gannett Co. and The New York Times Co. The industry is divided between them and "everybody else," Courtney said.

Given the current poor climate for the business, he said: "I have doubts banks will be as willing as they were in the past to waive or amend covenants."


----------------
Now playing: Godsmack - Awake
via FoxyTunes

Thursday, April 10, 2008

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part IX

Yes, I'm still alive. Which is more than I can say for my former employers:

Journal Register Company Considering Bankruptcy Filing

Journal Register weighs restructuring

"Earlier this week, the New York Stock Exchange notified the company that its share price was too low and that it might be delisted."

By "too low" they mean "under $1 a share", and by that they mean "28 cents at the close of today's market."

I remember it being big news when the company went public in... I want to say 1999, but it may have been 1998. If the worst-case scenario comes to pass here, it'd be even bigger news.

----------------
Now playing: Pearl Jam - Glorified G
via FoxyTunes

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part VIII

This is another public service announcement.

If you're a disgruntled employee, and if you're thinking of, let's say, creative ways to express your displeasure, and one of the things that crosses your mind is, oh, how do I put this delicately... soiling the bathrooms at your place of employment...

...don't bother.

It's been done.

(We have independent confirmation from well-placed sources that this is legitimate. Besides, I'm not good enough to make this one up.)

Sunday, August 5, 2007

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part VII

Undercover NBC Dateline reporter bolts from DEFCON 2007 by ZDNet's George Ou -- Undercover reporter Michelle Madigan (Associate Producer of NBC Dateline) got a little more than she bargained for when she tried to sneak in to DEFCON 2007 with hidden cameras to get someone to confess to a felony. When DEFCON staff announced the “spot the undercover reporter” game and told the audience that an undercover reporter [...]



We can also file this under "Things People Do To Make Their Jobs Much, Much Harder Than They Need To Be."

Sheesh.

If nothing else, the video's hilarious.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part VI

Courier-Journal blogger ejected from NCAA baseball super-regional

A Courier-Journal sports reporter had his media credential revoked and was ordered to leave the press box during the NCAA baseball super-regional yesterday because of what the NCAA alleged was a violation of its policies prohibiting live Internet updates from its championship events. Gene McArtor, a representative of the NCAA baseball committee, approached C-J staffer Brian Bennett at the University of Louisville's Jim Patterson Stadium in the bottom of the fifth inning in the U of L-Oklahoma State game. McArtor told him that blogging from an NCAA championship event "is against NCAA policies. We're revoking the credential and need to ask you to leave the stadium."

Courier-Journal executive editor Bennie L. Ivory challenged the NCAA's action last night and said the newspaper would consider an official response.

"It's clearly a First Amendment issue," Ivory said. "This is part of the evolution of how we present the news to our readers. It's what we did during the Orange Bowl. It's what we did during the NCAA basketball tournament. It's what we do."

U of L circulated a memo on the issue from Jeramy Michiaels, the NCAA's manager of broadcasting, before Friday's first super-regional game. It said blogs are considered a "live representation of the game" and that any blog containing action photos or game reports would be prohibited.

"In essence, no blog entries are permitted between the first pitch and the final out of each game," the memo said.

Bennett had filed Internet reports from U of L's NCAA Tournament games at the Columbia (Mo.) Regional and did so from the first two games of the super-regional.

He was told before yesterday's game by U of L assistant sports information director Sean Moth that he was violating NCAA policy by filing periodic reports for The Courier-Journal's Web site, courier-journal.com.

After consulting with his editors, Bennett filed a report at 4:12 p.m. after the top of the first inning and added 15 more reports before he was asked to leave. U of L won 20-2 to advance to the College World Series in Omaha, Neb.

"It's a real question that we're being deprived of our right to report within the First Amendment from a public facility," said Jon L. Fleischaker, the newspaper's attorney.

"Once a player hits a home run, that's a fact. It's on TV. Everybody sees it. (The NCAA) can't copyright that fact. The blog wasn't a simulcast or a recreation of the game. It was an analysis."

During the middle of yesterday's game, Courier-Journal representatives were told by two members of the U of L athletic staff that if the school did not revoke Bennett's credential it would jeopardize the school's chances of hosting another NCAA baseball event.

"If that's true, that's nothing short of extortion and thuggery," Ivory said. "We will be talking to our attorneys (today) to see where we go from here."

Said U of L athletic director Tom Jurich: "As an NCAA institution, we must abide by all NCAA rules, including those in hosting NCAA events. Our staff sought an amicable solution to this situation from many angles.

"It's unfortunate that it led to the actions that were taken. This is not an issue that should mar the most fantastic day for college baseball in this state."

McArtor said he did not "think it serves any purpose" to answer questions and declined further comment.

U of L's associate athletic director for media relations, Kenny Klein, referred questions to Michiaels, who did not return a telephone call yesterday.

-----------

Yeah, it's high time the NCAA moved into the 21st century. Or at the very least, the 20th.

Best line so far comes from Deadspin poo-bah Will Leitch: "The First Amendment vs. the NCAA. The battle we've all been waiting for."

Here's more.

Saturday, April 1, 2006

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part V (Or Just Move)

McClatchy Rides On Population Growth Plan

By SETH SUTEL, AP Business Writer
Fri Mar 31, 2:35 PM ET

NEW YORK - The McClatchy Co.'s strategy of cherry-picking newspapers in rapidly growing cities was long seen as a good idea for the mid-sized publisher, but not necessarily a model for the rest of the industry.

But now that McClatchy is vaulting into the big leagues with its acquisition of the much larger Knight Ridder Inc. — and keeping only 20 of its 32 newspapers in fast-growing markets — many are wondering if that will now become the new gold standard for valuing newspapers.

That topic is sure to be much discussed at the newspaper industry's annual convention, which gets under way Sunday in Chicago.

So far, Wall Street has not focused heavily on a company's presence in growth markets in assigning valuations. According to a recent report from Morgan Stanley analyst Doug Arthur, McClatchy's stock is trading at around 7.1 times estimated 2006 earnings, about even with Tribune Co. at 7.3 times and below industry leader Gannett Co. at 7.6 times.

That partially reflects the decline in shares of Sacramento, Calif.-based McClatchy since the $4.5 billion takeover of Knight Ridder was announced on March 13. Analyst attribute the share decline to concerns about whether the sale of the San Jose Mercury News, The Philadelphia Inquirer and 10 other Knight Ridder papers will generate enough cash to make a big dent in McClatchy's post-takeover debt, which will include $2 billion in assumed debt from Knight Ridder plus a $3.75 billion bank loan.

McClatchy took pains to point out that while the papers being divested didn't meet its own acquisition criteria, which take into account other factors besides projected household growth, they were quality assets which were attracting wide interest from potential owners.

McClatchy hasn't commented on which parties have placed initial bids for the papers, although a union representing workers at most of the papers has put in a bid for all of them, and Gannett and MediaNews Group Inc. have both said they were having a look.

Being in growth markets has always been important, but newspapers have myriad ways of generating big profits even in slower-growing markets, including owning clusters of papers to save on costs and going after burgeoning suburbs with zoned editions. Plus, being in fast-growing markets has challenges of its own, such as keeping competitors at bay.

Still, being in a growing city is usually better than the alternative. "Everybody wants to buy growth markets," says media economist Miles Groves. "Maintaining your franchise and your readership and advertising base is much harder in a declining or flat market than it is in a growth market."

John Miller, a portfolio manager with Ariel Capital Management, which has stakes in several newspaper companies, says investors may start to consider growth characteristics as a new metric of value. To date, he says, investors tend to focus on other factors including clustering, household penetration and readership.

In the meantime, as other newspapers are put up for sale, location in a growth market is sure to be high on the minds of potential acquirers, says longtime industry analyst John Morton, an independent consultant based in Silver Spring, Maryland.

"There are only so many growth markets," Morton says. "As concentration of ownership goes forward, you'll see future acquisitions of newspaper chains go pretty much the way this one did: The buyer will keep the growth markets and discard the rest."

The Knight Ridder sale was something of a special case because it was forced to put itself up for sale by its largest shareholders, and didn't have a separate class of supervoting stock to keep control with the founding families, as is the case with several other publishers such as The New York Times Co.

But other newspapers are bound to come to market, and when they do, the rising prominence of McClatchy's growth-market model will be keenly considered. And among the large, publicly held companies, there are often great differences in the growth characteristics of the cities in which they own papers.

Take Tribune Co., which has come under pressure recently from investors concerned about its prospects for growing newspaper revenues. According to demographic data crunched for The Associated Press by SRC LLC, the same company in Orange, Calif. whose technology McClatchy licenses to make its own analyses, several of Tribune's papers are in markets growing slower than the national average, as measured by projected household growth.

Baltimore, Long Island and Stamford, Conn. all show slower than average growth, according to SRC's data, but Orlando, Fla., where Tribune owns the Orlando Sentinel, shows very fast growth.

Likewise, several cities with papers owned by E.W. Scripps Co. also register sharply varied growth, with Naples, Fla., where Scripps owns the Naples Daily News, showing extremely fast growth, while Abilene and Wichita Falls, both in Texas, are much slower.

Some other newspaper markets that show big projected household growth include Denver, with newspapers owned by Scripps and MediaNews Group Inc.; Phoenix, where The Arizona Republic is owned by industry leader Gannett; and Bloomington-Normal, Ill., where Lee Enterprises Inc. owns The Pantagraph.

However, there aren't that many growth markets to go around. According to SRC data, only about one-third of the cities defined as metropolitan statistical areas by the federal government show the kind of supercharged growth that McClatchy has in its cities, which are forecast to add households at a rate that is about 50 percent faster than the average rate of growth in the rest of the cities.

Newspapers can still be very profitable in slower-growing markets, especially if they are part of a cluster than cuts down on back-office costs and allows area-wide advertising sales. Other newspapers also grow by expanding into new areas with zoned editions.

Supercharged market growth can also present its own challenges. In Las Vegas, the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal says keeping up with that city's growth has required constant change — adding staff to cover new school districts; following readers as they migrate to suburbs; and coping with expanding delivery routes.

Over the past 13 years, the family-owned paper has launched 11 weekly newspapers to keep up with the sprawling growth, and it now also owns a business weekly, a Spanish-language weekly and an alternative weekly, all to make sure it doesn't get beat out by a hungry competitor.

"You need to reinvest to stay on top of a growing market," says Sherman Frederick, publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and president of Stephens Media Group, which also owns dailies in several other states. "If you're a daily newspaper and you don't do the raft of ancillary products, especially in a growing market, you're making a big mistake."

Sunday, July 3, 2005

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part IV

Great timing, huh?

Media Principles Tested By War on Terror

By Claudia Parsons
Fri Jul 1, 6:45 PM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - As it wages war in the name of democracy, the U.S. government stands accused by critics of eroding freedom of the press at home as journalists face jail for principles they say are enshrined in the Constitution.

But with the media struggling to regain public confidence after a string of reporting scandals, journalists too are under pressure not to let their principles override security at a time when the United States has declared a "war on terrorism."

Time magazine said this week it would hand over a reporter's notebooks to a grand jury despite that reporter's willingness to go to jail to keep his promise to protect his sources.

Time's Matthew Cooper and Judith Miller of the New York Times have been held in contempt of court for refusing to name sources they spoke to about CIA operative Valerie Plame, whose name was revealed by a conservative columnist in 2003.

Time's move was condemned by the International Federation of Journalists, which has 500,000 members in over 100 countries, as a "profound betrayal" of principle.

"It's open season on journalists -- and by extension, information the government doesn't want people to know," The Seattle Times wrote in an editorial.

Lucy Dalglish, head of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said the judiciary had become more aggressive in demanding information from journalists since the 9/11 attacks.

"We're seeing more subpoenas in the federal courts in recent months than we have in the last 35 years," Dalglish said. "We're seeing more and more secrets being kept by the federal government since 9/11."

That means reporters are ever more dependent on confidential sources, even though their use has contributed at times to falling public confidence in the media after scandals involving shoddy reporting and plagiarism.

Rodney Smolla, dean of the University of Richmond Law School, said the views of the American public and media were growing further apart. "To most people it's very hard to see why a journalist's right to protect his sources would trump national security," Smolla said.

CONFUSION OVER TIME CASE

The latest soul searching came after the Supreme Court let stand a ruling that Cooper and Miller should be held in contempt for refusing to reveal who they spoke to in connection with the Plame case. Cooper may avoid imprisonment but Miller could be jailed despite never writing about the conversations in question.

A federal appeals court said this week four journalists could be held in contempt for refusing to name sources in the case of a nuclear scientist once suspected of espionage.

And in December, a Rhode Island reporter was sentenced to six months of house arrest for refusing to name a source.

While media reaction to Time's decision was mixed, with some supporting its argument that journalists are not above the law, there were few people writing in support of jailing Miller and Cooper.

Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh said it was "over the top." "It's a dangerous thing when in politics we end up wanting our enemies to go to jail," he said during a discussion of the case on air on Thursday.

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said the cases set a bad example for the media in repressive countries.

"President Bush has raised the need for greater press freedom in Russia, the Middle East, and Asia, but the message from U.S. prosecutors and courts is being heard more clearly in repressive corners of the world," the CPJ said.

But Bob Giles, curator of Harvard's Nieman Foundation for Journalism, said it was hard to see "a Bush fingerprint" on the case of Cooper and Miller. They were caught up in the investigation by a special prosecutor into the alleged leak of Plame's identity by the Bush administration.

Plame's diplomat husband, Joseph Wilson, says the leak was an attempt to discredit him after he had publicly disputed a claim by Bush about Iraq's attempts to secure illegal weapons.

Bush has said a journalist's right to protect sources is a "difficult tightrope."

"Look, I'm a First Amendment guy," he said. "On the other hand, there's some information which could damage our ability to collect information, and that's where the real rub has been so far from my perspective."

Saturday, January 8, 2005

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business, Part III

Education Department Paid Commentator to Promote Law

By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY

Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same.

The campaign, part of an effort to promote No Child Left Behind (NCLB), required commentator Armstrong Williams "to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts," and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004.

Williams said Thursday he understands that critics could find the arrangement unethical, but "I wanted to do it because it's something I believe in."

The top Democrat on the House Education Committee, Rep. George Miller of California, called the contract "a very questionable use of taxpayers' money" that is "probably illegal." He said he will ask his Republican counterpart to join him in requesting an investigation.

The contract, detailed in documents obtained by USA TODAY through a Freedom of Information Act request, also shows that the Education Department, through the Ketchum public relations firm, arranged with Williams to use contacts with America's Black Forum, a group of black broadcast journalists, "to encourage the producers to periodically address" NCLB. He persuaded radio and TV personality Steve Harvey to invite Paige onto his show twice. Harvey's manager, Rushion McDonald, confirmed the appearances.

...

"I respect Mr. Williams' statement that this is something he believes in," said Bob Steele, a media ethics expert at The Poynter Institute for Media Studies. "But I would suggest that his commitment to that belief is best exercised through his excellent professional work rather than through contractual obligations with outsiders who are, quite clearly, trying to influence content."

----------------------------

Yeah, and people wonder why nobody trusts the news media anymore.

How come nobody wants to buy my opinion on something? (Answer: Because no sane man would pay for it.)

Monday, May 24, 2004

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business (Part II)

Journalists Worried Financial Pressures Are Hurting News Quality

By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Journalists are growing more concerned that bottom-line financial pressures are "seriously hurting" the quality of news coverage, according to a survey taken at a time when news organizations face increased competition for readers and viewers.

A majority of national and local journalists say they think financial pressures are hurting coverage, said the survey released Sunday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.

"Journalists are in a glummer mood than we've found them in the past," said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. "That view is much more prevalent where cutbacks have happened."

The number of national journalists who think bottom-line financial pressures are hurting coverage was 66 percent this year, compared with about 40 percent in a Pew survey from 1995.

Just under six in 10 local journalists were more worried about financial pressures hurting quality, compared with one-third in 1995.

More than half of the executives at national news organizations said increased business pressures are "just changing the way news organizations do things."

Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, said a news media study earlier this year found many news organizations have cut staff.

"We found that most sectors of the news media, other than online and ethnic media, are losing audience because there is so much more competition," Rosenstiel said.

About half of those whom Pew surveyed from newspapers and magazines said they have seen reductions in the size of their newsroom staff in the past three years.

Despite these concerns about cut, about seven in 10 news professionals say the management in their news operation is excellent or good.

National journalists were more likely than a decade ago to say there are too many factual errors in coverage, while local reporters were less inclined to say that was a problem.

A majority of journalists of all backgrounds and different type of operations said they do not think plagiarism is more widespread now, despite widely publicized cases in the past year.

The survey found a reduction in the number of journalists who think news reporters are too cynical and many now think they are too timid.

More than half of national journalists say the press has not been critical enough of President Bush (news - web sites). Local journalists were about evenly split between thinking the press is not critical enough or is fair in its treatment of the president.

Nearly eight in 10 in both the national and local news media say that not enough attention is paid to complex issues, similar to Pew's findings on this question in 1995 and 1999.

A majority of news professionals say the emergence of the Internet has made journalism better, especially because it has improved research methods.

The survey was taken from March 10 through April 20 of 547 national and local journalists, both print and broadcast. The sample was chosen from national directories of staffers, editors and executives at newspapers, magazines, wire services, national networks and local television stations from the 100 largest markets.
----------
On the Net:
Pew Research Center: http://www.people-press.org
----------
Someday, maybe even someday soon, I'm going to uncork a full-scale rant about this.

EDIT: Apologies for the millions (AND MILLIONS) of reposts. I kept getting "Connection closed by remote server" errors and eventually gave up.

Wednesday, March 17, 2004

I Have GOT To Get Out Of This Business

Report Sees Bleak Trend in U.S. News Media
Mon Mar 15, 7:29 AM ET


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most U.S. news media are experiencing a steady decline in their audiences and are significantly cutting their investment in staff and resources, according to a report issued on Monday.

The study on the state of the U.S. news media by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which is affiliated with Columbia University's graduate journalism school, found only ethnic, alternative and online media were flourishing.

"Trust in journalism has been declining for a generation," said project director Tom Rosenstiel. "This study suggests one reason is that news media are locked in a vicious cycle. As audiences fragment, newsrooms are cut back, which further erodes public trust."

Circulation of English-language daily newspapers has dropped 11 percent since 1990; network news ratings are down 34 percent since 1994; late night local TV news viewership fell 16 percent lower since 1997 and cable news viewership has been flat since late 2001.

On the positive side, Spanish-language newspaper circulation nearly quadrupled over the past 13 years and advertising revenues were up sevenfold.

The report cataloged a striking decline in the number of journalists employed in American newsrooms. There were one third fewer network correspondents than in 1985; 2,200 fewer people at newspapers than in 1990; and the number of full-time radio newsroom employees fell by 44 percent from 1994 to 2001.

Only 5 percent of stories on cable news contained new information, the report found. Most were simply rehashes of the same facts. There was also less fact checking than in the past and less policing of journalistic standards.

Quality news and information were more available than ever before, but so was the trivial, the one-sided and the false.

Consumers with the time and patience to distinguish between many different sources of news might be better informed, but many were likely to find news outlets that echoed their own view of the world without providing alternative viewpoints.

Technology was driving many of the changes.

"Journalism is in the midst of an epochal transformation, as momentous probably as the invention of the telegraph or television," the report said.